Provided ability to classify and data (e.g., item master, approved manufacturer’s data could be associated with BOM structure data)
Created ability to manage multilevel BOM relationship and search for where-used assemblies
Early databases required IT/ technical resources and were “home-grown” solutions
Separated from systems and processes that managed change orders, drawings, files, and other documentation
Increased productivity and quality of mechanical or electrical designs (vs. manual, hand-drawn designs)
Provided ability to generate BOM and export for use in downstream systems
Failed to introduce any real BOM-related advantages beyond what CAD solution offered
PDM solutions typically addressed only one CAD tool and didn’t provide comprehensive way to manage ALL aspects of design (e.g., electrical, mechanical, software)
Improved and helped automate production planning, procurement, and manufacturing processes
Included ability to manage BOM record more effectively
Focused on latest-release BOM used for production and planning, not on all preproduction revisions in design and development
Did not address supply chain collaboration
As these solutions were introduced, many companies leveraged more than one, resulting in disparate systems across the enterprise. This led to a patchwork of systems in which impacted teams had difficulty identifying the right revision or product design.
Impact of Complex Products and Supply Chains
The Evolution of BOM Management
Early BOM Management Solutions
Addressing Broader Product Development Processes
Extending Traditional PLM Boundaries
Contrasting BOM Management Solutions
The 5 Key Factors to Drive Intelligent BOM Management
Proven BOM Management for Product Innovators & Zero Wrong BOMs